Wednesday, November 29, 2006

A little fun

As I've neglected Fortean Faith for a while I'm posting this bit of fun as Fortean Times is being all serious at the moment. So take the test - which Disney character are you? It seems I'm Goofy, gee thanks. It reminds me of Bill Murray in Ghostbusters saying, about Sigourney Weaver; "ok, so, she's a dog!"

You scored as Goofy. Your alter ego is Goofy! You are fun and great to be around, and you are always willing to help others. You arn't worried about embarrassing yourself, so you are one who is more willing to try new things.

Goofy

94%

The Beast

75%

Cinderella

56%

Pinocchio

50%

Donald Duck

44%

Snow White

38%

Cruella De Ville

31%

Sleeping Beauty

25%

Peter Pan

25%

Ariel

19%

Which Disney Character is your Alter Ego?
created with QuizFarm.com

Sunday, November 12, 2006

Today is Remembrance Day


Each Remembrance Day we honour those who gave so much to serve their country, and those who risk their lives even today to keep peace around the world. May God bless and keep them.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Intelligent design vs evolution


This is a well argued topic and I think it important to state one's terms of reference and why. In other words; are we talking of an intelligent being actually creating the Earth, our solar system and the rest of the universe? (and if so how did that being come to being?) Are we talking of a powerful, intelligent being creating the appearance of the world we know on a planet that happens to exist? (as Aslan did in Narnia or did he actually create the world, I never thought so, I thought he just created Narnia ie. the plants, animals etc.) Or are we talking about an extra terrestial intelligent being creating Man on a planet already populated with plants, animals etc.? Definitions from Wiki then:

Intelligent design
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Intelligent design (disambiguation).
Part of the series on
Creationism

History of creationismCreation in GenesisGenesis as an allegory
Types of creationism:Creation scienceIntelligent designIslamic creationismModern geocentrismNeo-CreationismOmphalos creationismOld Earth creationismProgressive creationismTheistic evolutionYoung Earth creationism
Controversy:Creation vs. evolution... in public educationAssociated articlesTeach the Controversy

Intelligent design (ID) is the concept that "certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection."[1][2][3] Its leading proponents are all affiliated with the Discovery Institute.[4][5][6][7][8][9] They say that intelligent design is a scientific theory that stands on equal footing with, or is superior to, current scientific theories regarding the evolution and origin of life.[10]

Which is not to be confused with: Creationism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to:
navigation, search
"Creationism" can also refer to origin beliefs in general, or to an alternative of traducianism.

In many religious traditions, creationism is ideological support of the belief that humanity, life, the Earth, or the universe as a whole was specially created by a supreme being (often referred to specifically as God[1]) or by other forms of supernatural intervention. In other common definitions, it is referred to more precisely as the belief in a literal interpretation of specific religious works referring to God creating the universe.[2][3] This divine intervention may be seen either as an act of creation from nothing (ex nihilo) or the (re)-emergence of order from pre-existing chaos (demiurge).

Evolution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to:
navigation, search
This article is about evolution in biology. For other uses, see Evolution (disambiguation).

In 1832, while travelling on the Voyage of the Beagle, naturalist Charles Darwin collected giant fossils in South America. On his return, he was informed in 1837 by Richard Owen that fragments of armour were from the gigantic extinct glyptodons, creatures related to the modern armadillos he had seen living nearby. The similarities between these two unusually scaly animals and their geographic distribution provided Darwin with a clue that helped him develop his theory of how evolution occurs.[1]
In biology, evolution is the change in the heritable traits of a population over successive generations, as determined by shifts in the allele frequencies of genes. Over time, this process can result in speciation, the development of new species from existing ones. All contemporary organisms are related to each other through common descent, the products of cumulative evolutionary changes over billions of years. Evolution is thus the source of the vast diversity of life on Earth, including the many extinct species attested to in the fossil record.[2][3]

Which should not be confused with the Big Bang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from
The big bang)
Jump to:
navigation, search
For other uses, see Big Bang (disambiguation).

According to the Big Bang, the universe emerged from an extremely dense and hot state (bottom). Since then, space itself has expanded with the passage of time, carrying the galaxies with it.
In physical cosmology, the Big Bang is the scientific theory that the universe emerged from a tremendously dense and hot state about 13.7 billion years ago. The theory is based on the observations indicating the expansion of space (in accord with the Robertson-Walker model of general relativity) as indicated by the Hubble redshift of distant galaxies taken together with the cosmological principle.
Extrapolated into the past, these observations show that the universe has expanded from a state in which all the matter and energy in the universe was at an immense temperature and density. Physicists do not widely agree on what happened before this, although general relativity predicts a gravitational singularity (for reporting on some of the more notable speculation on this issue, see cosmogony).

Geddit?

We can actually view the Earth changing and taking shape now - click on the picture below to take you to the source: raincoaster's blog with more details of this happening.


So is this an indication of evolution and the power of the natural world happening? Or we in fact a science project in the bedroom cupboard of a deity?

Friday, November 10, 2006

Life after death

Job

"He that goeth down to the grave shall come up no more." 7:7-9

Job says that humans perish at death like their own dung. Well, one might fault him for his choice of words, but the idea seems sound enough. 20:7

One of the reasons people cite for believing in God, for having faith in a deity, is the consideration of death. It is a comfort to many to think they may avoid death in some way, that there is an afterlife. To consider that when you die you're dead and that's it is too blunt and dark and without hope for some to continue life happily. They seem to need hope. Hope that this isn't all there is, that every moment doesn't matter quite so much and there may be more, and there may be forgiveness. And also, that the people they miss so much may still, in some way, shape or form be still there. It is a comfort to believe they may be waiting, somewhere.

Monday, November 06, 2006

Global warming


If we have 10 years to save the planet from global warming and don't, we're all screwed anyway. Where does God fit into this?

And when the planet hosted only anaerobic life, was God there?

If you believe in intelligent design (which can't possibly explain G.Dubya) would you expect God to keep us as a species? Or are we as dispensable as green/blue algae or the dinosaurs?

Did dinosaurs pray? If not, was that their downfall?

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Saddam Hussein verdict

Saddam Hussein has been sentenced to death by hanging for crimes against humanity. He asked for death by firing squad. Associated press reports "The visibly shaken former leader shouted "God is great!"

(Mind you, BBC news 24 reported that Hussein shouted "long live the nation" or something like it, maybe he shouted a lot while he still can. See BBC news here.)

An all knowing God, lover of concord

When it comes to family values, you'll have to excuse me if I get a bit confused when reading Genesis:
Abram makes his wife lie for him, by telling the Egyptians that she is his sister. But at least it was half-true, since she was his half-sister. Such incestuous marriages are condemned elsewhere in the Bible, but God makes an exception for Abram and Sarai. (See Gen.17:15-16 where God blesses their marriage.) 12:13

Sarai is the first of a long line of barren women who were desperate for children. (In the Bible, it is the women who are barren, never the men.) She sends Abram into her handmaid, Hagar, so that she can "obtain children by her." Abram gladly complies. 16:1-4

Hagar conceives, making Sarai jealous. Abram tells Sarai to do to Hagar whatever she wants. "And when Sarai dealt hardly with her, she fled." 16:6

Lot refuses to give up his angels to the perverted mob, offering his two "virgin daughters" instead. He tells the bunch of angel rapers to "do unto them [his daughters] as is good in your eyes." This is the same man that is called "just" and "righteous" in 2 Peter 2:7-8. 19:8

God kills everyone (men, women, children, infants, newborns) in Sodom and Gomorrah by raining "fire and brimstone from the Lord out of heaven." Well, almost everyone -- he spares the "just and righteous" Lot and his family.19:24

Lot's nameless wife looks back, and God turns her into a pillar of salt. 19:26

Lot and his daughters camp out in a cave for a while. The daughters get their "just and righteous" father drunk, and have sexual intercourse with him, and each conceives and bears a son (wouldn't you know it!). Just another wholesome family values Bible story. 19:30-38

Honest Abe does the same "she's my sister" routine again, for the same cowardly reason. And once again, the king just couldn't resist Sarah -- even though by now she is over 90 years old. (See Gen.12:13-20 for the first, nearly identical, episode.) 20:2

God gets angry with king Abimelech, though the king hasn't even touched Sarah. He says to the king, "Behold, thou art but a dead man," and threatens to kill him and all of his people. To compensate for the crime he never committed, Abimelech gives Abraham sheep, oxen, slaves, silver, and land. Finally, after Abraham "prayed unto God," God lifts his punishment to Abimelech, "for the Lord had fast closed up all the wombs of the house of Abimelech, because of Sarah." 20:3-18

God "closed all the wombs" because Abimelech believed Abe's lie. 20:18

Abraham married his sister, and God blessed their marriage (17:15-16). 20:12

Sarah, after giving birth to Isaac, gets angry again at Hagar (Gen.16:5-6) and tells Abraham to 'cast out this bondwoman and her son." God commands Abraham to "hearken unto her voice." So Abraham abandons Hagar and Ishmael, casting them out into the wilderness to die. 21:10-14

God orders Abraham to kill Isaac as a burnt offering. Abraham shows his love for God by his willingness to murder his son. But finally, just before Isaac's throat is slit, God provides a goat to kill instead. 22:2-13

Abraham shows his willingness to kill his son for God. Only an evil God would ask a father to do that; only a bad father would be willing to do it. 22:10

Abraham had several concubines. 25:6

Isaac loved Esau because Esau was a hunter and Isaac loved venison. Rebekah loved Jacob, but God hated Esau (see Rom.9:13). No reason is given for why one son is loved while the other is hated. But since God chose to act this way, it must have been as an example for parents to follow. Have you decided which of your children to hate? 25:28
I honestly am not trying to rubbish anything, I am just sometimes genuinely confused when I read the Bible. Have you read the book of Job? May God forgive me for questioning but I'm glad to say that I'm not the only person, man or woman, to feel this way.

Saturday, November 04, 2006

For your information

The BBC website has information here about different religions and also associated message boards on which you can introduce topics or comment on existing threads.

No don't thank me, save it for Christmas, when everyone should be appreciated for something. Then again you could have found this using Google... ah nuts!

Thursday, November 02, 2006

The Origin of Life

God's goodness
From Brian Chadwick (Christian)

BIBLE-BASHING author Richard Dawkins (News, October 11), ought to admit (if there is no such thing as an absolute objective moral standard flowing from Almighty God) that his appeal to some other kind of standard for judging another person's conduct is seriously flawed and basically can be nothing more than his own personal opinion and taste.

Dawkins, and those who broke into a "truly thunderous round of applause", when the God of the Old Testament was blasphemed and described as "arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction", need to be reminded that the Bible unashamedly calls upon us all to consider carefully: "the goodness and severity of God".

Attacking the God of the Bible based upon our own likes and dislikes of how an omniscient acts does not in any way disprove the Bible or the existence of God.

Evolutionists need to spend more time trying to harmonise their theory with known and tested scientific laws like:

1. The Law of Biogenesis (a scientific law stating that life comes only from pre-existing life and that of its kind; and 2. The Second Law of Thermodynamics (a scientific law stating that matter and energy always tend to change from complex and ordered states to disordered states.

Remember, the theory of evolution demands the false science of life from non-life and order from disorder. This is the exact opposite of true scientific knowledge and observation.

Queen Edith's Way
Cambridge

(Letter ripped off from here )